Saturday, February 3, 2007

Gates of Vienna: Questioning the Sanity of Liberals



"Is it possible to be well adjusted, attractive, educated, successful, and a liberal? Alternatively, is it possible to be both Politically Correct and a liberal at the same time? In order to understand the peculiar contradictions of contemporary liberalism it is necessary first to understand the meaning of classical liberalism circa 1900 and the liberalism of the West in 2007.

Classical liberalism meant a belief in the democratic process, freedom of the press, freedom of expression, equality of opportunity (although never quite couched in such terms), the presumption of innocence, small government, the individual before the group, religious freedom, trial by jury, habeas corpus, the rights of the child, an obligation to help the genuinely disadvantaged in society and, generally speaking, a live and let live laissez-faire attitude. It was the product of many hundreds of years of gradual evolution encompassing Christianity, the reformation, the enlightenment, common law, the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. It was a cause for the good and the term liberal one to be worn with pride."

Continue...:

Sphere: Related Content

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

That is a great article, very eye-opening. Some so-called liberals should be strapped down and forced to listen to it being read to them; because most would be incapable due to fear of the truth.


absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
never debate moonbat thoughts

truth eventually wins
one on one they will fold
.