Thoughts on gyneocracy and liberalism by Lawrence Auster

An Indian living in the West writes:

Gyneocracy isn’t just about women being in some important positions of power. It is also the condition of the men—the men become soft, effeminate and decadent. So the gyneocracy is much more than just a few liberal women prancing around on foreign soil. It also has to do with the female vote in the U.S. (more than half of all voters—women live longer than men), females in American colleges (I am Charlotte Simmons) and the type of men this produces etc. The argument is that gyneocracy is of much wider import than we assume. People, for example, thought that the presence of Janet Reno in the Cabinet was an indication of gyneocracy. But that’s a limited view. Clinton was a gynaecratic president—the women loved him and they were primarily responsible for his eight years in office (even though he himself abused his position to have oral sex with an intern).

He continues with further thoughts:

In the time I have spent in Europe, I have had the occasion to understand Gyneocracy better—upon reflection.

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content