Saturday, April 14, 2007

What Reagan Taught Us About Being Conservatives By Martin A. Knight - Redstate

"During the 1960s and 70s, the conservative movement in America was all but pronounced dead. Democrats had advanced an aggressive left-wing agenda under Johnson (such as the War on Poverty and the Great Society) that indebted the country, both figuratively and literally, to liberal policies. Heading into the 1980s, Republicans had not had control of the Senate or the House since 1954, sometimes facing deficits of 23 seats or more in the Senate alone. Nixon had tarnished the Republican and the conservative name with the Watergate scandal. Americans identified themselves as Democrats more than Republicans by a 25% margin in many polls. The media and many Americans began asking if Republicans would ever be in power again. Conservatives, they said, had gone the way of the whigs.
But in the midst of certain permanent defeat, conservatives were handed two beautiful gifts. The first was the disastrous presidency of a peanut farmer from Georgia. But even one of the worst Presidents in modern history couldn't have turned the tide of five decades of history that seemed bent against conservatives. For that, we needed our second gift: an actor-turned politician from California."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Challenging liberal assumptions By Alan Roebuck

"The conservative movement has focused more on winning political contests than on winning the war of ideas. As a result, liberalism is increasing its dominance as the Unofficial State Religion, the system of thought that serves as the basis for all important government decisions and provides most people with their basic understanding of reality.
Therefore we conservatives need to aim at winning the war of ideas. Specifically, we need to identify the fundamental errors of liberalism, prove them to be errors, and state the conservative truths that correct these errors. Our message should be: 'We conservatives know how things really are, the liberals don't, and here's why.' This will catch the attention of a postmodern, truth-denying world.
We need to change minds. The main impediment to a person's changing his mind is his intellectual presuppositions. Conservative apologists therefore need to do something that they rarely do now: concentrate on the presuppositions of liberalism. For example, when speaking of Darwinism, we should ask, Is naturalism true? When discussing multiculturalism, we should ask, Why is 'diversity' good? When discussing homosexuality, we should ask, How do you know that homosexual conduct is morally acceptable? These and other questions that go to underlying presuppositions are the weak points of liberalism, partly because few people can even identify their own presuppositions, and partly because liberalism cannot defend its presuppositions with the usual liberal intellectual apparatus."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Forcing U.S. to quit in Iraq::By Charles Krauthammer

"By the day, the debate at home about Iraq becomes increasingly disconnected from the realities of the actual war on the ground. The Democrats in Congress are so consumed with negotiating among their factions the most clever linguistic device to legislatively ensure the failure of the administration's current military strategy -- while not appearing to do so -- that they speak almost not at all about the first visible results of that strategy.
And preliminary results are visible. The landscape is shifting in the two fronts of the current troop surge: Anbar province and Baghdad.


Marine Corps Commandant James T. Conway greets Iraqi border enforcement troops at a fort in far western Anbar province on the Syrian border, last Friday, April 6, 2007. (AP Photo/Robert Burns) The news from Anbar is the most promising. Only last fall, the Marines' leading intelligence officer there concluded that the U.S. had essentially lost the fight to al-Qaeda. Yet, just this week, the marine commandant, Gen. James Conway, returned from a four-day visit to the province and reported that we 'have turned the corner.' "

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

"Gay" Goliath Lobs Dud at CWA; Aims for Clever, Lands on Silly By Matt Barber

The pro-homosexual Human Rights Campaign (HRC) has asked Concerned Women for America (CWA) to the political Jitterbug dance; and though CWA don't swing that way, we'll make an exception this one time....Invitation accepted.

You can't help but be a little embarrassed for Joe Solmonese and his partners over at HRC. With an annual budget of nearly 40 million dollars, you'd think that ol' Joe could afford some writers and spinmeisters worth their salt. But apparently HRC has set aside the lion's share of its fundraising purse for Hillary Clinton's speaking fees and to maintain that fabulous interior office design. And so the cheeky graduates of Joe's Bar and Community College have hit the job placement bonanza.

A couple of weeks ago, it was learned that the alleged high-profile "hate crime" involving 72 year-old "gay"-identified Andrew Anthos, which was used by liberals in Congress to justify introduction of The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act (H.R. 1592), was in fact a fraudulent report. Let that sink in a minute. The very "hate crime" intended to whip up an emotional frenzy in support of "hate crimes" legislation, which would grant homosexuals and cross-dressers superior victim status over children and the elderly, never even happened.

Sphere: Related Content

Setting the Record Straight By Janice Shaw Crouse

Feminists sometimes throw provocative stuff with unsubstantiated claims out there and hope that some of it sticks. That's the reaction I had reading Katha Pollitt's latest article –– "Europeans do it Better" (The Nation, April 2, 2007). What got her in a tizzy is the upcoming World Congress of Families IV in Warsaw, May 11-14 –– a conference that she accurately described as promoting large natural families and religious orthodoxy. But when she described the founder –– Allan Carlson, a respected conservative scholar who heads the Howard Center for Family, Religion & Society (a Rockford, Illinois think tank) –– as a right-wing, "family values" ideologue she revealed her bias, sarcasm and condescension.

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, April 13, 2007

Will the biggest racist please stand up? by Bobby Eberle

"America’s racial “crusaders,” Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, are at it again. If there’s a racial injustice to right, they are on the scene to save the day. But… who is doing the saving, and who is doing the self-promoting? If Jackson and Sharpton really cared about ridding America of words and actions which are degrading to women, they would realize that Don Imus’s idiotic comments are small potatoes.
The other day on his radio program, talk show host Don Imus referred to the women of Rutgers University’s basketball team as “nappy-headed hos.” The comments set off a fire storm of reaction, which led Jackson and Sharpton to enter the scene.
The fact of the matter is that Imus’s comments are wrong and have no place on the airwaves. Racial slurs are not a “joke,” and Imus’s crude remarks should be rebuked. That’s why Jackson and Sharpton are stepping forward… to be the champions of racial and gender justice, right? Not so fast…
The good “reverend” Al Sharpton has a history of using racial attacks to further his cause. As noted in the 2003 column by Jeff Jacoby, in 1987 Sharpton spread a hoax that a 15-year-old black girl was “abducted, raped, and smeared with feces by a group of white men.” Sharpton singled out one particular white man, saying, “If we’re lying, sue us, so we can . . . prove you did it.” The man does sue and wins $345,000."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

An Offer They Can’t Refuse By Bob Parks

"As a result of the whole Don Imus controversy, I’ve been meaning to get to this. I’d like to expound on a point made and offer a challenge. It all began on MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann….

KEITH OLBERMANN: “I’ll ask you the ten million dollar question: How does Rush Limbaugh or Michael Savage get away with worse than what Don Imus said?”

SAM SEDER, AIR AMERICA: “I’ll tell you something, well I think one there’s a certain expectation that they’re going to hear it more from Limbaugh although, you know, he, Dick Cheney was on his program several weeks ago. I listened in to Limbaugh today and he’s already warning his audience that they’re going to be coming for Limbaugh next."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Gates of Vienna: Is European Civil War Inevitable By 2025? - Part Two

"Part one of this article was an explanation of why our ratio of combat age native Europeans versus European Muslims could decline from 18:1 today, to 2:1 by 2025. These figures are largely irrelevant if one believes that Islam can peacefully co-exist within the West, but if such a scenario is simply a multicultural fantasy then we will shortly face a situation unprecedented in the history of mankind.

Europeans have been conditioned from an early age to celebrate diversity and multiculturalism, resulting in our genuine ability to co-exist with peoples of significantly different cultures. But, rather than what we want, is this what Islam wants? Islam is as mono-cultural as mono-cultural gets. How can they possibly live in a liberal, multicultural society?

Islam expanded via the sword. Within decades of erupting out of the deserts of 7th Century Arabia it had conquered Palestine, Persia, Egypt, India, North Africa and Spain; its opponents were paralysed in the face of fanatical violence. It was only in 732 that Charles Martel stopped this frenetic Islamic expansion at the battle of Tours, in France."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

Stan of Arabia 2 - Francine's Song

Sphere: Related Content

Exclusive coverage of Drs. Sultan, Pipes, and Brook at UCLA Panel Discussion on Islam with Protests [video/pics] By Infidels Are Cool Blog

"I decided to covertly attend this discussion at UCLA on Thursday evening with my friend and co-worker Steve. We knew from posts like Jawa’s and LGF’s that it would definitely be an interesting event, with Wafa Sultan, Daniel Pipes and Yaron Brook speaking. Considering the controversial nature of the issue and previous disruptions at Daniel Pipes speeches, we were on the lookout for crazy protesters or worse from the many that showed up outside Moore Hall. Living up to expectations, shortly after arriving we saw many protesters handing out ridiculous “Expose Daniel Pipes” brochures, that were obviously pure propaganda handed out by the local Imam’s minions. Although no violence erupted at this event, a small police force was present from start to finish and all members of the discussion panel were wearing bullet proof vests underneath their clothing.
We got there a little early, around 6:45, to make sure we got seats for this popular event. This is what it looked like behind me once we got up to the front. Obviously it was a packed house, and people were streaming in to grab a seat as soon as someone would leave long after the discussion began."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, April 12, 2007

The War on Children By J.R. Dunn

"It seems at times that not a week goes by without a child disappearing or being found dead under ghastly circumstances. It may well be as appalling to you as it was to me to learn that there's no easy means of checking whether or not this sort of crime is increasing at a national level. Child molestation is not one of the seven 'index crimes' utilized by the FBI to track the crime rate. At best, such crimes will be mixed in with 'assaults' or sex crimes in general. There is no central source, and no way to be certain whether the numbers are rising, falling, or standing still.

But general impressions are often correct in cases such as these. That was true with the great crime wave of the 60s, in which the public at large insisted that something unprecedented was occurring with crime levels, while the media, experts, and academics preferred to view it as simply a 'statistical mirage' created by improved reportage. The public was correct -- crime was exploding, increasing faster than at any other time in the nation's history, nearly quadrupling over a period of ten years. Something similar seems to be the case here.

These crimes appear to be peaking in terms of viciousness as well. One example will suffice, a case referred to by Alicia Colon in a recent column."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Yes, Virginia, There is an American Union Waiting in the Wings… :: Gates of Vienna

"But it’s not the fifty states anymore. Can you sing “God Bless American…and Mexico and Canada”? If not, too bad, because it’s the number one hit song of below-the-radar appointed personnel who are even now at work on bringing this nightmare to your waking, working hours.

It’s not enough that we have had to watch the helpless citizens of Europe steamrollered by the Brussels Bureaucrat Brigade. We’re going to have the same blesséd experience ourselves.

A number of readers have emailed Gates of Vienna with their concerns, and with links to the problem. As history repeats itself this wolf in sheep’s clothing is being trotted out all gussied up as an “economic” agreement among the three nations of the North American continent.

It is nothing of the sort; this is a very broad-based attempt by unelected officials who are actively planning to run roughshod over our sovereignty and our constitution. There are several components and many players behind the scenes. Let’s start with just one: a superhighway running from Canada all the way down to the Mexican ports.

Let’s start with the basics:"

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Welcome to the no man's land of the 'North Americanist' By Judi McLeod

"Some call it 'regionalization', population of which will come to be known as the 'North Americanists'. Some call it North American Union, NAU for short, or the benign sounding North American Community.
Few call the coming end of the sovereignty of three nations globalization, but rarely what it really is, the persistent encroachment of One World Government.
The United Nations-like European Union now governs all of Europe. In the latest U.N. move, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has asked New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg whether some of the city's police officers could be deployed with U.N. peacekeeping missions.' (www.Breitbart.com, April 11, 2007.)
The main architects of the North American Union, who inexorably pieced it together over decades, were quick to quell the first signs of public unease. Any Erin Brockovich piloting her way through government paperwork could always be tossed to the wolves, branded as a conspiracy theorist. Heroes not worn down by the wall of bureaucracy are scarce and often live the life of the loner. The road of tracking down information hidden from public view gets lonely. The enthusiasm of their friends and supporters soon wanes, and doors begin to slam when the few doing the digging are mocked for seeing Communists behind every lamppost and black helicopters hovering over their cities. "

Welcome to the no man's land of the 'North Americanist'

Sphere: Related Content

Global Terror Alert Video Cybercast No. 2

Sphere: Related Content

Why the “Whites as Cancer” Myth?

"So far I have written many articles describing the “whites as cancer” myth, but I have not yet put forth any theory to explain why it has been so attractive to Westerners. It is one of history’s great riddles, perhaps its greatest: why has our race turned against itself? Why do whites, contrary to reason and the natural inclination to racial pride, slander their own culture and history, and glorify those of other races?
There are certainly many reasons for this, but there is, I believe, one primary reason. It is because whites who slander their own people have managed to convince the world that they are smarter, more courageous, and more sophisticated than the rest of us. Slandering your own people indicates that you have managed to overcome your ethnocentric prejudice, or the natural bias in favor of your own people and nation.
Ethnocentric prejudice had become a prominent topic in American cultural life by the time of the Vietnam War. The social theory of the 1950s and 60s blamed the rise of the Nazis on ethnocentric prejudice and also detected much potential for fascism in American culture."

Fullm Article...

Sphere: Related Content

From 'Rock Star' to Pariah: Conservative Teacher Sues University -- CNS

"An academic who received awards for excellence and produced several peer-reviewed publications said he fell from grace when he began espousing 'religious beliefs and [a] conservative political viewpoint' and is now suing his university for denying him promotion.

Criminologist Mike Adams has filed suit against the University of North Carolina-Wilmington, saying the school refused to promote him because his superiors disagreed with his religious and political beliefs.

According to the complaint filed on Monday, Adams was hired to teach at UNCW in 1993 and has served as an associate professor since 1998. During his tenure, he was named 'Faculty Member of the Year' three times and generated research resulting in 10 peer-reviewed publications.

Adams applied for full professorship in 2004, but the then-interim chair of the department -- who was known as an outspoken feminist with leftist political leanings -- raised concerns about Adams' 'political activity' and reprimanded him for his weekly nationally syndicated column.

In 2005, Dr. Kimberly Cook took over the school's Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice. An outspoken atheist said to have openly criticized Christianity, Cook described to a recruitment committee her ideal candidate for a teaching position as 'a lesbian with spiked hair and a dog collar.'"

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Looks Like Al Sharpton And Jesse Jackson Will Be Protesting On The Streets Of London - Ankle Biting Pundits Blog

"Given that MSNBC has dropped Don Imus due to advertisers pulling out, er, because of his remarks, I’m guessing that race-hustling hypocrites Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, both of whom are “Reverends” (Of what? The First Church Of Jew Hating and Media Whoring?) are going to take their act across the pond, especially given Tony Blair’s remarks blaming black culture for a recent spate of violence in England.
Blair, sounding much like Bill Cosby, didn’t mealy-mouth the problem by blaming it on “poverty”, as many American liberals are wont to do, laid the blame squarely at the feet of what he calls the “black culture” that spawned the criminals."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

New York Times Wrong on Israel’s Origin and “Right of Return” by Alex Safian, PhD

"Did fighting lead to Israel’s creation? And do Palestinians who fled Israel in 1948, and their descendants, have a legal or moral right to return to former homes in Israel? One might think so from the New York Times’ March 26th article on the subject, “For Many Palestinians, ‘Return’ Is Not a Goal,” by reporter Hassan Fattah.
Fattah, for example, in relating the views of Nimr Abu Ghneim, a Palestinian in Jordan, writes:
... there can be no peace with Israel until he and 700,000 other Palestinians are permitted back to the homes they left in the 1948 fighting that led to Israel’s creation.

The “1948 fighting that led to Israel’s creation”? Perhaps Times reporters and editors have forgotten that Israel was created by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181, which also called for the creation of a Palestinian state. When, at the end of the Palestine Mandate, Israel declared its independence, five Arab armies along with Palestinian militias went to war against the new state. It might be a good idea for Times editors to review articles in their own paper from those days, for example the one at left about the day the Arabs started the war."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

Waiting for The Prince By James Mazol

"The debating club currently masquerading as a legitimate government in Baghdad will never attain its goal without establishing dominant authority first.
In the early 16th century, a young Italian patriot sat nightly in his study, reading and writing with a missionary fervor. The wisdom of the ancients and his pen soothed the persistent mental torture he felt while helplessly watching his precious Italia ravaged by foreign armies and domestic discord. His name was Niccolo Machiavelli. The product of those nights, The Prince, is the indispensable guide for anyone interested in gaining and holding power. It was also a call for a man to take power and unite Italy for the sake of its humiliated people.

What is needed to stabilize the situation in Iraq is a Machiavellian Prince, a man to definitively end the violence tearing the cradle of civilization asunder. He must be willing and skilled at occasionally employing immoral measures to consolidate his rule, so that Iraqis will enjoy enough solidarity to give them a chance at living in the republic they deserve."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Two Enlightenments By Linda Kimball

"The Anglo-American variant of Enlightenment thought is distinct for its emphasis on God as man's creator, morality and virtue, family, religion, individuality, property, custom, law, community, order, freedom, prosperity, and recognition of man’s fallen nature.
“9th Circuit Endorses Censoring Christians,” ruling declares ‘family values,’ ‘natural family,’ and ‘marriage’ constitutes hate speech.
— WorldNetDaily, 3/8/07
“Walter Cronkite Endorses Campaign to Force Christianity Out of US Public Life”
— LifeSiteNews, 2/28/07, Gudrun Schultz)
These are but two examples out of thousands that expose the Left’s relentless assault against America’s founding Christian-Judeo worldview and traditional culture. All too many Americans allow these attacks to occur because on one hand, they’ve been dumbed-down and deceived by the education establishment and media, while on the other hand, they’ve been taken in by a myth.
The myth assures Americans that there was but one Enlightenment school of thought, that it is synonymous with American ideals and progress, and that religion — particularly Christianity — must be kept strictly separate from the State. Not only is all of this untrue, but these notions are invidious alien transplants to our shores.
In fact, a schism occurred among Enlightenment thinkers from which emerged two distinct and antithetical schools of thought. For ease of identification, Balint Vazsonyi refers to them in his book America’s 30 Years War as the Anglo-American and the Franco-Germanic."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Madame Traitor - National Summary

Back in day when Democrats were proud Americans first and not socialist weasels who hated their nation, only the President or his duly appointed representatives would negotiate with foreign leaders. The U.S. government only presented one voice and one message to foreign governments.

Now the Democrats are openly and proudly flaunting their break with this essential tradition and publicly undermining President Bush and our national security. At heart, many Democrats really aren’t concerned about our security because they only pretend to love this country.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi privately met Syrian President Bashar Assad for talks to circumvent the official American policy to isolate this hostile Arab country.

Syria is not our friend and never has been and never will be.

To entertain any such thoughts that they will be is foolish.

Syria and its leadership are only interested in one thing; furthering its own interests any way possible. They have been expanding their interests at the expense of the Lebanese government for decades and they are currently doing do so in Iraq.



Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Perhaps Terrorists Really Do Speak For Islam by Greg Lewis

"The time has come to consider, not whether it is Islamo-fascists who are waging war against the United States and Israel, but rather whether it is Islam itself that is waging war against us. Indeed, while Islamist terrorists are numerically a relatively small segment of Islam, there are so few Muslim voices being raised even against the most heinous atrocities the Islamists commit that it is not inaccurate to say that Muslims in general desire the fall of the west at the hands of their terrorist forces.
It's not, of course, a simple or straightforward matter. Islamic terrorist factions exert powerful influence over other Muslims, especially in the Middle East, through tactics that range from direct intimidation through more subtle coercion down to what amounts to outright bribery.
The city of Baghdad, with its weekly catalogue of grotesqueries that invariably include the discovery of the bodies of citizens tortured and beheaded for the simple reason that they had the misfortune to belong to the 'wrong' Islamic sect, has become a constant reminder to all Muslims of the risks involved in standing up against the mass slaughter of their co-religionists at the hands of monsters.
And although the pace of the sectarian massacres has lessened significantly, don't expect acknowledgment of this initial success of the American troop surge from Democrats and the mainstream media any time soon. Harry Reid's typically blank mien seems to get even blanker, if that's possible, when anyone mentions that progress is being made in securing Baghdad as a result of the troop surge and changing Iraqi governmental policies."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

THE DIVERSITY DEMON By: Al Cronkrite

The New World was initially settled by Reformed Christians of English origin. Though there were differences, both the Pilgrims and the Puritans adhered to the Reformed Faith.

As the colonies established themselves they became a magnet for Christian groups with divergent theological views. Congregationalists, Lutherans, Anglicans, Moravians, Presbyterians, Quakers, Heugenots, Amish, Brethern, Mennonite, Dutch Reformed, and Roman Catholics planted seeds in the available fertile ground, all put down roots and grew.

Efforts to maintain the exclusivity of the Reformed Faith were futile. The Thirteen Colonies became a potpourri of diverse Christianity. Following the Revolutionary War more denominations were established: Episcopals, Methodists, Universalists, Unitarians, and Mormans all developed substantial followings.

When the Constitution was constructed in the late Eighteenth Century there were so many religious denominations that any attempt to designate a preference would have opened a hornets nest. A number of the colonies themselves had competing official religions. The First Article of the Bill of Rights addressed this issue by removing the right of the government to establish a particular religion and guaranteeing the right of all religions to exist.

Though it was common for the State Constitutions of the original thirteen colonies to mention the name of the Savior, the Constitution for the United States of America did not. Delaware was the first colony to ratify the new document in December 1787. Legislatures of many of the thirteen colonies produced significant resistance. With a vote of 34 yeas and 32 nays, Rhode Island was the last colony to ratify in May of 1790. Of the total votes cast by all colonies there was one nay for every two yeas.

Though our fledgling nation was ninety eight percent Christian, conflicting theologies

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Business of Global Warming Feels a Lot Like Inquisition By William F. Buckley

"The heavy condemnatory breathing on the subject of global warming outdoes anything since high moments of the Inquisition. A respectable columnist (Thomas Friedman of The New York Times) opened his essay last week by writing, 'Sometimes you read something about this administration that's just so shameful it takes your breath away.'
What asphyxiated this critic was the discovery that a White House official had edited 'government climate reports to play up uncertainty of a human role in global warming.' The correspondent advises that the culprit had been an oil-industry lobbyist before joining the administration, and on leaving it he took a job with Exxon Mobil.
For those with addled reflexes, here is the story compressed: (1) Anyone who speaks discriminatingly about global warming is conspiring to belittle the threat. Such people end up (2) working for Exxon Mobil, a perpetrator of the great threat the malefactor sought to distract us from."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Global Warming Fears Overblown - Leadership and the Environment By Richard S. Lindzen - Newsweek

"Judging from the media in recent months, the debate over global warming is now over. There has been a net warming of the earth over the last century and a half, and our greenhouse gas emissions are contributing at some level. Both of these statements are almost certainly true. What of it? Recently many people have said that the earth is facing a crisis requiring urgent action. This statement has nothing to do with science. There is no compelling evidence that the warming trend we've seen will amount to anything close to catastrophe. What most commentators—and many scientists—seem to miss is that the only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes. The earth is always warming or cooling by as much as a few tenths of a degree a year; periods of constant average temperatures are rare. Looking back on the earth's climate history, it's apparent that there's no such thing as an optimal temperature—a climate at which everything is just right. The current alarm rests on the false assumption not only that we live in a perfect world, temperaturewise, but also that our warming forecasts for the year 2040 are somehow more reliable than the weatherman's forecast for next week."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Bush's Immigration Defeatism By Rich Lowry


Not all incremental progress is equal in the eyes of President Bush. When it occurs in Iraq, it is a sign that we need to forge ahead despite all difficulties. When it occurs on our southern border, it is deemed insufficient and a sign that — to use a favorite GOP phrase — we need to settle on a “surrender date” on immigration enforcement.

That date would be whenever Bush’s latest “comprehensive” reform proposal kicked in. He wants to legalize illegal immigrants already here and invite in “temporary” guest workers. When Congress finishes with it, this probably will be another proposal to solve the illegal-immigrant problem by making all immigrants past and future legal. This is the immigration-enforcement version of “declare victory and go home.”

And Bush wants to do it just as increased enforcement — like “the surge” in Baghdad — is showing tentative signs of progress. Apprehensions of illegals are down across the border, an indication that fewer of them are coming. Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies notes that the foreign-born population grew by only 500,000 last year, significantly off the annual pace of growth since 2000.

Full Aricle...

Sphere: Related Content

Sharia Calling - A warning from Germany By Kathryn Jean Lopez

In a German case in which a Muslim, Moroccan-born 26-year-old mother of two was petitioning for an expedited divorce from a man who had beaten her and threatened her life, Judge Christa Datz-Winter denied the woman’s request, a woman who already had a restraining order on her husband after police were called last May because he attacked her. The reason for the injudicious divorce denial? The Koran, the judge said, instructs that “men are in charge of women.” She explained further that the couple hails from a “Moroccan cultural environment in which it is not uncommon for a man to exert a right of corporal punishment over his wife.”

I’m not normally a fan of speedy divorce — or of divorce at all, for that matter. But surely divorce exists for precisely these circumstances.

Clearly, Datz-Winter’s was a reprehensible ruling. But it’s also one that highlights real problems we face all over the world. It’s at the heart of this war we’re in. It’s at the heart of struggles by so-called moderate Muslims who would never dream of beating their wives or condoning anyone who would engage in or justify such brutality.

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

The Paradox of Reason by Thomas Brewton

Liberal rationality leads to chaos, thence to tyranny.

The foundation of liberal-Progressive-socialism, beginning with the pre-Revolutionary French Encyclopedists, has been belief in the supremacy of human reason as the sole guide to social order. In practice it turns out to be a foundation of sand, always washed away in the deluge of political tyranny.

Reason as the only source of wisdom was almost immediately stripped of such pretense and revealed as naked savagery in the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror, instituted to compel conformity to the revolutionists’ political aims.

After the 1789 Revolution, France was reeling under wild swings from monarchy, to attempts at constitutional government, to the rule of street mobs. Matters came to a head with the execution of King Louis XVI in January, 1793. The Assembly’s Revolutionary Tribunal and the Committee of Public Safety announced,

It is wholly necessary to establish briefly the despotism of freedom in order to crush the despotisms of Kings. (quoted in André Maurois, A History of France).

What “the despotism of freedom” meant was the bloody Reign of Terror. The Revolutionary Tribunal, during fourteen months of continuous sessions, condemned more than 70,000 people to the guillotine: children, men and women, old and young, aristocrats, monarchs, priests, ordinary citizens, and peasants.

Similarly, sixty years later with the advent of Darwin’s hypothesis of evolution, liberals began the destruction of the English and American foundations of constitutional democracy. As Darwin’s champion Thomas Huxley declared, the morality of Judeo-Christianity was ignorant superstition. There was no such thing as sin, no such thing as right or wrong; there was only the struggle for survival.

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Have Christians Become Dupes? by Chuck Baldwin

As I peruse the hundreds of email letters I receive, one observation leaps out at me: in the last few years, there has been a distinct philosophical shift taking place in the reasoning of professing Christians. Somewhere along the way, politicians seem to have been granted a kind of spiritual status. This trend is very troubling and portends great problems for our country. Let me see if I can explain.

Whenever I take issue with the policies or actions of President George W. Bush, I am inundated with all kinds of emails from Christians who usually tend to quote Bible passages regarding “spreading gossip” and “not loving a Christian brother,” etc. The same is true when I dare to challenge the statements or actions of notable Christian leaders in the politically oriented Religious Right. What is going on here?

I will tell you what is going on: countless millions of Christians have elevated certain politicians and their mouthpieces in the Religious Right into a church-sphere or even into a God-sphere. In other words, because a politician or conservative celebrity claims to be a Christian, they are presumed to be untouchable. Such people must not be criticized or challenged, no matter how unconstitutional or stupid their actions might be, because doing so makes one guilty of some kind of spiritual law against speaking ill of Christian brothers.

Sphere: Related Content

Prayers for the Enemy By Robert Spencer

Everyone loves moderate Muslims, but no one is quite sure how to identify them. Unfortunately, some of those who claim to be moderates have turned out not to be: as one police official in Southern California said a few years back, “We’ll come back from a Kumbayah meeting with a local mosque and realize that these guys who just agreed to help us are in our terror files!” And Fawaz Damra, the former imam of the largest mosque in Cleveland, Ohio, was a signer of the Fiqh Council of North America’s condemnation of terrorism – not very long before he was ordered deported for his ties to terror groups. These days many politicians seem to be having trouble identifying moderates, for recently two Muslim leaders have been showcased who appear to be anything but moderate – underscoring the need in these days of the global resurgence of Islamic terrorism for our public officials to have a much more comprehensive understanding of Islam than most have today.

Full Article...
See Video here

Sphere: Related Content

Mythologizing Murder By Jack Cashill

A new and much heralded documentary by Peter Miller, simply titled Sacco and Vanzetti, purports to tell the true story of these two doomed Italian immigrants.

Like so much produced by the left, however, the film tells us more about the filmmaker and his enthusiastic reviewers than it does about history

A review by Phil Hall in Film Threat captures Miller’s intent and the typical progressive critical response. According to Hall, this “excellent documentary” shows how a “hideous prejudice against Italian immigrants” and a “fear of European rooted political movements” led to the railroading of two innocent men—men who “actually abhorred violence.”

This is utter nonsense. In reality, the reporting on the trial stands as a brilliant prototype of the Soviet ability to manipulate the world media to its own ends. As Miller and his reviewers have unwittingly proved, contemporary leftists are as eager to be duped as their literary predecessors, but they have far fewer excuses for being so.

In the way of background, the early Soviets absorbed not only Karl Marx’s economics but also his morality, such as it was. In their pursuit of the larger truth—pravda—they scorned any petty factual truth—istina—that stood in its way. The man who brought this new system of power, the so-called “lying for the truth,” to the West was an unlikely German Communist named Willi Munzenberg. A sort of roughneck publisher, Munzenberg had an instinctive feel for the power of the media and persuaded Lenin to let him apply it.

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

George Soros' Malicious Screed By P. David Hornik

Late in March Hamas released a video for its Al-Aksa TV in the Palestinian Authority that shows young children in military gear, complete with rifles, engaging in military training. The video’s lyrics include: “These are the acts of Martyrdom-Seekers [of] Palestine. . . . Its children carry the knife. . . . Its children carry machine guns. The land is filled with furious lions.” (See the video here.)

A few days earlier Hamas had released another TV video with a dramatization of Duha Riyashi, four-year-old daughter of the female suicide bomber Reem Riyashi (who killed herself and four Israelis in January 2004). The girl sings to her dead mother: “Duha loves you. My love will not be [merely] words. I am following Mommy in her steps. [Finds explosives that mother left in her drawer, picks up stick of explosives.] Oh Mommy, oh Mommy.”

As far as I know, positively portraying a four-year-old-girl as aspiring to blow herself up in acts of mass murder is unprecedented in human history. It marks a level of depravity that the mind has trouble grasping. On the other hand, it is not surprising coming from Hamas, which is officially defined as a terrorist organization by the United States, Canada, the European Union, and Israel, is estimated to have murdered over five hundred Israelis and wounded thousands, and among whose most famous attacks are those on the Dolphinarium Disco in Tel Aviv in June 2001, which killed 21 mostly teenage Israelis, and on the Park Hotel in Netanya on Passover night in March 2002, which killed 30.

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Blogs For Borders Video Blogburst 041007

Sphere: Related Content

EATING CHINESE By: Alan Stang

George W. Bush is the moral equivalent of a bestial psychopath, a serial killer who specializes in dismemberment. He is a monster and whatever else like it you can say. And the latest proof of that comes out of China. Regular readers know that, like most of the threats we face today, Red China was created by the United States. Without the intervention of the District of Criminals and our Communist media, Red China would have never been born.

Soviet tool George C. Marshall boasted that with a “stroke of the pen” he had disarmed 39 Republic of China divisions, refusing to send arms to those divisions voted for them by the Congress, the same thing Washington did to South Vietnam and now is trying to do to our own military in Iraq. Media here constantly characterized Mao Tse-tung as an avuncular Chinese version of Abraham Lincoln. The Chinese government, our longest, most loyal ally in the Far East, fell. Mao became the biggest mass murderer in the history of the planet. See America’s Retreat From Victory, by Senator Joe McCarthy.

It was Socialist con man Richard Nixon who “opened the door” to Communist-occupied China. Socialist con man Bill Clinton took the door off its hinges. Red China says the United States is the “main enemy,” but Clinton committed treason by doing everything he could to build its military and nuclear capability.

Full article...

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, April 9, 2007

Against All Odds at the Border By Robert Klein Engler

"The debate over 'comprehensive immigration reform' will capture again the attention of both Congress and the media. Few in either of these institutions will come out and say that at the heart of this debate is the issue of amnesty: how many should get that amnesty and through what means?

The truth is that we do not need comprehensive immigration reform. What we need is to have the laws already on the books enforced. What we need is enforcement, deportation, and secure borders. It is wrong to say our immigration system does not work: it is Congress that does not work for the interest of the nation.

In spite of efforts by groups like NumbersUSA and the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, it looks like Congress and the media may take the easy way and do what should not be done: go along with all the special interests arrayed against enforcement, deportation, and secure borders. Congress will offer some kind of amnesty to the more than 12 million who are in the U. S. illegally.

The special interests groups who oppose enforcement, deportation, and secure borders are legion. They believe that their might will make right. It is worth listing these groups so that ordinary Americans understand the forces that are dissolving their country and diminishing their citizenship."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Arab Press Adores Pelosi - The American Israeli Patriot

"Let there be no doubt as to the extent of the damage caused by Nancy Pelosi's Mid-East adventure. The Arab press, which is for the most part nothing short of government propaganda, is falling over itself in praise of Pelosi's visit. Read on, courtesy of MEMRI;

Columnist Muhammad Ali Boza wrote in the Syrian government daily Al-Thawra that Pelosi's visit was 'an important turning point in American public policy, on the level of the street and public opinion, which has begun to act as a pressure on the government and to understand – even if belatedly – the severity of the damage that the official policy of the new Republicans sic has caused...'

'There is no doubt that the diplomacy of dialogue and negotiations with Syria, and listening to the Syrian position on the burning subjects and the numerous issues relating to the region and the conflict, are recognition of the importance and centrality of the Syrian role, and [recognition] that it is impossible to ignore it and leap over it, and that it would be absurd to put forward plans or solutions to which Syria does not agree, and which are not in keeping with Syria's fundamental national and pan-Arab principles...'"

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

Newt Gingrich and the Left - Maggie's Notebook

For several years Newt Gingrich has been my choice for President in 2008, but I changed my mind several months ago. While Gingrich is an exceptional thinker, creative and civil in thought and speech, and most certainly wants the best for America, he is deeply entrenched in Congressional friendships.

Thursday, Newt was interviewed by Paul W. Smith, sitting in for Rush Limbaugh. The news is next Tuesday’s debate on climate and environmental issues between Newt and John Kerry. When I first learned of this debate my reaction was, this is a very good thing. Newt has long been immersed in environmental issues and no one puts conflicting thought into succinct words better than Gingrich.

So, I'm listening to Gingrich and Smith, and liking the prospect of this debate, until...Newt emphasizes that the debate will not be a verbal “Wrestlemania,” points out his “long relationship” with Kerry, and then really rubs it in with “he’s a smart guy.” I am nauseous from hearing conservatives tout their civil accord with Democrats.

Smith pushes on and cuts to the chase, asking what all of conservative America wants to know:

"Honestly, you can take Kerry can't you?"
Newt's immediate, and defensive, response is,
"It's not a question of taking him."
You see, Newt wants to have "interesting dialog;" he wants to discuss "market oriented science," and that's all well and good – it’s a discussion this country needs to have, but the Left intends to bring America to its knees on this issue, fueled by the elite's quest for even more wealth, by manipulating the everyday habits of industrious Americans. They have no interest in entrepreneurial-endeavors that expose the folly of carbon credits and such.

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

MappingSharia.us - Society of Americans for National Existence , A Letter to our Fellow Americans


"As most of you know, the biggest threat America faces today is from Islamic Jihadists operating all over the world and especially right here in America! Intelligence sources, both public and classified ones, inform us that al Qaeda and many related, affiliated or kindred Muslim terrorist organizations and operational cells are located in the United States. Some are actively planning and preparing for the next major wave of terrorism on our Homeland. Others are “sleeper” cells, biding time and waiting for the right opportunity and command instructions from overseas.
What we also know from our intelligence sources, and again much of this is public information, is that the ideological infrastructure is already in place for the Islamic assault on American from within America. This includes Islamic mosques, day schools, and social clubs and other organizations openly teaching historical, traditional and authoritative Islamic law or Shari’a."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

Iran crisis shows bankruptcy of UN and EU By Mark Steyn

"Twenty-seven years ago, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was a student in Tehran and is said (by a former Iranian president, for one) to be among those in the U.S. embassy who seized and held American citizens hostage for over a year.

Today, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is president of Iran and bears less ambiguous responsibility for Western hostages. This time round, they’re British subjects: 15 sailors and Royal Marines. There are a few differences between this kidnapping and the last: Back in 1979, the Iranians seized their hostages by invading a diplomatic mission—the sovereign territory of the United States. In 2007, they seized them in international waters. In 1979, two weeks after the embassy crisis began, 13 American hostages who happened to be black were released; the remainder were held for another 14 months. In 2007, the one woman among the hostages is being offered by the regime for early release, invitingly dangled in front of the TV cameras, though with her Royal Navy uniform replaced by Islamic dress; it remains to be seen what will become of the others. On Thursday, a new generation of “student demonstrators” called for the “British aggressors” to be executed.

On this 25th anniversary of the Falklands War, Tony Blair is looking less like Margaret Thatcher and alarmingly like Jimmy Carter, the embodiment of the soi-disant “superpower” as a smiling eunuch."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

America's Broken-Down Media By Ray Robison

"According to Mark Thompson, writer for Time magazine, America's army is broken. While it can not be argued that the military can possibly maintain the same state of readiness in war time as it does in peace time, broken has a certain specific ring to it: incapable, demoralized and poorly trained.

Mr. Thompson begins the article, - featured on the Drudge Report - with the story of Private Matthew Zeimer. Brave PVT Zeimer died within hours of his arrival at a Forward Operating Base in Iraq. Thompson describes PVT Zeimer's training before going on to make the case that the surge cut the young Private's training short. In Mr. Thompson's recounting of PVT Zeimer's tale, he essentially was killed because he had insufficient training.
If Zeimer's combat career was brief, so was his training. He enlisted last June at age 17, three weeks after graduating from Dawson County High School in eastern Montana. After finishing nine weeks of basic training and additional preparation in infantry tactics in Oklahoma, he arrived at Fort Stewart, Ga., in early December. But Zeimer had missed the intense four-week pre-Iraq training-a taste of what troops will face in combat-that his 1st Brigade comrades got at their home post in October. Instead, Zeimer and about 140 other members of the 4,000-strong brigade got a cut-rate, 10-day course on weapon use, first aid and Iraqi culture. That's the same length as the course that teaches soldiers assigned to generals' household staffs the finer points of table service."

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

THE SEXUALIZATION & COMMERCIALIZATION OF CHILDREN

"Yet another reason why parents are at war with our culture to preserve the innocence of our youth. Here is an admission from a British teachers union that our youth is being corrupted by materialism and commercialization. When the left-leaning leaders of public education in the West admit a cultural problem you can be sure that it is much worse than they perceive and report.

A culture that embraces sin will not tolerate innocence. Like an alcoholic that seeks the company of other drinkers, the materialistic and oversexed are all too anxious to share their love of sin with children. Further, the indiscriminate participation of our children in the lowest forms of our culture inevitably results in the perversion of childhood. "

As a mother of five children seven and under, I can attest to the difficulty of finding modest clothes for little girls. Also, in speaking with acquantances who opted for public schools for their children, they are all in agreement, that children are growing up, or should I say are being corrupted, at very early ages. The teenage attitudes and the accompanying rebellion have backed up into adolescent years.

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

Is classroom Global Warming preaching indoctrinating the next generation? By Dr. Tim Ball

"Do you know what your children are learning in school about climate change? Have you ever looked at their textbooks? Is it education or indoctrination? How accurate are the facts? How much is it an ideological or a political message? Is it a balanced curriculum offering options or one imposing a singular view? How much is fear the vehicle of indoctrination?
Do you only learn about the material when your elementary school child can't sleep because of threats of a rising sea level? Are you like the mother who told me how children at a birthday party for her seven-year-old cried when a balloon burst because they said there would be another hole in the ozone? I hear from many people about children traumatized by what they have learned in school. A British survey of children between 7 and 11 found half of them are anxious about the impacts of global warming to the point of losing sleep. At what age do we place societal or world problems on young shoulders? US TV celebrity psychologist 'Dr. Phil' says emphatically, don't put adult problems on children's shoulders.
No doubt, environmental advocates like Al Gore and Canadian counterpart David Suzuki believe pushing their message to young people is necessary to produce the type of people they want for their world, but at what age is it acceptable? Aristotle distinguished between knowledge that was essentially innate and knowledge that required life experience to assimilate. Information about the latter is purely propaganda when introduced to the young. It is indoctrination."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

WorldNetDaily: Is man worth it? By Vox Day

"'For God so loved the world'' begins the best-known verse of the New Testament. But today, most of us spend so much time wondering about what is right for us that it never even occurs to us to spend a single moment wondering if we are right for God.
Atheists often sneer that God, even if He exists, is not worthy of their approval, let alone their worship, due to His many manifest failures in their eyes. Surely, they often argue, surely an all-powerful God can do better than He has done with what is obviously a failure filled with war, disease, misery and death. And so they turn to their new god, Science, in the hopes that it will build them a better world.
Such individuals would do well to consider the book of Job, and consider God's answer to those creatures who would seek to judge the Creator. "

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

Why Pelosi went to Syria By Joseph Farah

"The images of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi with a shmatte on her head simulating a burka were disturbing.
Not only did Pelosi choose unwisely to travel to the terrorist-sponsoring police state of Syria, a nation currently undermining the mission of our troops in Iraq right now, but she did so costumed in the subservient garb of a dhimmi chick, rather than the designer power suits she fancies when in Washington.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi in Syria
While Pelosi has been duly smacked for attempting to establish her own foreign policy in the midst of a war, I'd like to explain the why of this ill-begotten mission.
It goes without saying, Pelosi leads a party and an ideology that believes America is usually wrong, especially when it uses force to protect its vital national interests and the security of its people.
It's not wrong, of course, when it uses military force for completely capricious reasons that have nothing to do with national security – missions like Kosovo. In fact, if those actions actually undermine the long-range goals of the U.S. by supporting its enemies, all the better.
That's the strange intellectual and moral prism through which Pelosi tends to view the world.
So, naturally a trip to an arch-enemy of America, an obstacle to freedom in the Middle East and the world's headquarters for Islamo-fascist terrorists, would be a natural. "

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

The Ancient Persian Empire By Stefania Lapenna

"Tensions between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the West have been heightening. After years of appeasement in the hope of getting something in exchange, Western leaders now seem to have realized that multilateral talks on the nuclear issue inevitably lead nowhere. Hence, the idea of imposing UN sanctions is gaining consensus among the once-reluctant Europeans. No doubt that the Ahmadinejad factor is playing a significant role in further isolating Iran from the rest of the world.


The international community and public opinion are growing suspicious of the Mullahs' plans, and they are right to be. In every international dispute between two sides, psychological war is the rule, not the exception. In the case of the Iranian nuclear issue, we are witnessing just such an example: threats of an imminent military strike by the United States and Israel, naval maneuvers in the Persian Gulf and so on. But the reality is much more complicated, and it looks as if neither the Americans nor the Israelis are disposed to attack Iran, at least for now."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

Summer in Berlin By James Bowman

"'Posters were being put up in cities and towns across Germany yesterday,' reported the Times of London the other week, 'urging women to make use of the Baby-Klappe, with the slogan 'Before babies land in the rubbish bin...'' The Baby-Klappe is a hatch installed in German hospitals to allow women to deposit unwanted babies anonymously. It is hoped that it will halt a spate of at least 23 child murders so far this year. Typical is Susanne H. from Baiersdorf in Bavaria who strangled her newborn baby daughter and put the body in her freezer because, she said, her boyfriend 'threatened to throw me out if I concealed another pregnancy from him.' German fertility rates, like those across Europe, suggest that there is also a larger, cultural sense in which children are not wanted there.

Fortuitously, along comes Andreas Dresen's Summer in Berlin (Sommer vorm Balkon) to give us some insight into the state of the sexual culture where people seem to have lost the will to reproduce. Not, I hasten to add, that that is the film's purpose. It's really a female buddy picture before it is anything else, in which the friendship between Nike (Nadja Uhl) and Katrin (Inka Friedrich) is threatened when they compete for the attentions of Ronald (Andreas Schmidt). But the overwhelming sense of this movie is of hopelessness and limited options. Katrin is nearing 40, the divorced mother of 12-year-old Max (Vincent Redetzki), and she can't find a job. The film opens with a sadly comic look at the fierce competition and criticism she faces at the interview for even such lowly employment as a department store window-dresser. Her real passion is painting, but she can't sell any of that work either."

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

The Pirates of Tehran By Fred Thompson

"Oil prices fell. The stock market rose. Video images of smiling British soldiers with Iranian President Ahmadinejad were everywhere. So were pictures of the 15 freed hostages embracing family members back home. The relief over the return of the Brits was so tremendous; you could almost hear birds singing.
Maybe it's because military action won't be needed or maybe it's just because the ordeal won't drag on and on, but the world is breathing easier now. A lot of folks are happy. The problem, as I see it, is that Ahmadinejad seems to be the happiest.
And why shouldn't he be? He has shown the world that his forces can kidnap British citizens, subject them to brutal psychological tactics to coerce phony confessions, finagle the release of a high-ranking Iranian terror coordinator in Iraq, utterly trash the Geneva conventions and suffer absolutely no consequences. "

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

The Pelosicrats Coup d'etat by Jed Babbin - HUMAN EVENTS

"By the time Nancy Pelosi left for Syria, she had accumulated a hyper-liberal anti-war track record only Cindy Sheehan could equal. From the moment she was installed as speaker, she has run hard left. From attempting to get Jack “Cut and Run” Murtha (D.-PA) elected House Majority Leader over the liberal but still sane Steny Hoyer of Maryland to the current battle over the war supplemental appropriations bill -- which the House passed after inserting language that would force American withdrawal from Iraq by a date certain -- Pelosi has never deviated from the most radical position on the war.
On March 30, Pelosi’s spokesman issued a statement that said, “As recommended by the Iraq Study Group, a bipartisan delegation led by Speaker Pelosi intends to discuss a wide range of security issues affecting the United States and the Middle East with representatives of governments in the region, including Syria.” Which is a curious statement given that the ISG recommended that the United States conduct such discussions and Pelosi has no authority to decide whether those talks would occur or represent the United States in them. (Pelosi should read, or have someone read to her, Article 2 Section 2 of the Constitution which empowers the president to make treaties, appoint ambassadors and otherwise conduct foreign policy.)"

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content

The Great Al-Qaeda "Patriot" by Paul Sperry

"A man identified as 'Esam Omesh' spoke just before Cindy Sheehan at last month's antiwar rally that Sheehan headlined in Washington.
Following chants of 'Impeach Bush!' from shivering protesters, Omesh took the podium and exhorted 'brothers and sisters' to condemn Bush for the deaths of 'more than 650,000 Iraqi lives.' He demanded the White House 'pull our troops out of Iraq now' and 'end the war today.'

The speaker counted himself among the 'great American patriots' who braved the cold to march on Washington and protest the war that day.

While there may have been legitimate voices there, this speaker decidedly was not one of them. Not because he's Muslim, but because he's an Islamist tied to an al-Qaida fund raiser and the spiritual adviser to the 9/11 hijackers.

Turns out it his real name is Esam S. Omeish, and he runs a nonprofit group in Washington called the Muslim American Society, which the FBI believes is the U.S. branch of the dangerous Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist movement that operates like the mafia. The secret Islamist society counts Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahri, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and blind sheik Omar Abdel Rahman among its members. Its motto: 'The Quran is our constitution, the prophet is our guide; Death for the glory of Allah is our greatest ambition.'"

Full Article...:

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, April 8, 2007

Here is your answer! By Tychicus1769

Sphere: Related Content

China's Execution Buses

Sphere: Related Content

The Anxious Search: Are We Alone? By Tom Bethell


Second Story Books in Bethesda has a good selection of out-of-print science books and I drop by from time to time. I was surprised to find recently that they had a whole shelf of books about the search for extraterrestrial life. Here are just some of the titles, all published in the 1990s:

We Are Not Alone (1993), Are We Alone? (1995) Are We Alone in the Cosmos? (1999), Is Anyone Out There? (1992), Extraterrestrials: Where Are They? (1995), A Brief History of Life on Other Worlds (1998), The Hunt for Life on Mars (1997), After Contact: The Human Response to Extraterrestrial Life (1997), Beyond Star Trek (1997). I could add half a dozen more, and others have appeared since, including Rare Earth (2000), Where Is Everybody? (2002), and on and on. Since 1981, four books have been published with the title Are We Alone?

So what's this all about? The novelist Michael Crichton commented on one aspect of this comedy in an entertaining and instructive lecture at Caltech in 2003 -- "Aliens Cause Global Warming." There is "not a single shred of evidence for any other life forms and in 40 years none has been discovered. SETI is a religion," he said. Then he gave us a brief tour of nuclear winter, second-hand smoke, and finally global warming, wherein science always defers to politics. We are seeing a "loosening of the definition of what constitutes legitimate scientific procedure," he concluded.

Full Article...

Sphere: Related Content