ACLU Does Not Have 'A CLU(E)' or Does It? By Gabriel Garnica
The recent series of New Jersey challenges by that state’s ACLU chapter to laws designed to protect children from child predators is just another example of how dangerous and sinister this band of ghouls really is.
For ACLU, Children Always Left Behind
Jay Sekulow has pointed out the utter absurdity and irrational hypocrisy of the ACLU’s efforts to frustrate a township’s efforts to protect its children. In essence, the ACLU is fighting efforts to extend Megan’s Law protections through safety buffer zones keeping convicted predators away from certain areas where children are often found such as schools and playgrounds. They claim that such measures violate the rights of these people to live where they wish to live.
A community’s desire to protect its young should be tantamount and transcending. These are among the most vulnerable and helpless members of our society, and they represent our future. Likewise, those who would violate and corrupt our young are among the most vile and despicable vermin in our society. While it is arguable that a society should protect some rights of such people, there is no doubt as to where that society should fall when the rights of children directly conflict with the so-called rights of convicted child molesters.
Any mentality that knowingly exposes children to risk and harm in the interest of defending the rights of people who have already shown that they care little for the rights of the most innocent is misguided to say the least. Of course, one must qualify that “misguided” by linking it to rational, sensible and decent public policy with a clue about morality. The ACLU has repeatedly shown that its notion of what is rational, sensible, decent and moral is quite different than what most regular Americans believe.
From defending child pornography to treating convicted murderers as honored citizens, the ACLU has provided us with a clear picture of just what kind of behavior and activity it so passionately holds dear. In case after case and situation after situation, the ACLU has maintained one solid common denominator, which is the idea that children are mere playthings for adults with no rights of their own. Just as toys are meant for entertainment and enjoyment, children in the world of the ACLU are life-size Barbies and Kens for those adults whose infantile and juvenile mentality and morality reign supreme.
In the end, it is just one more step on the road to social oblivion for a society that allows unborn children to be murdered in the name of adult “rights” to then allow grown children to be abused and murdered in the name of other such “rights”.
Full Article...
No comments:
Post a Comment